In revealing the information, the plaintiffs say Aurora exposed them to emotional embarrassment, medical identity theft and identify theft. The complaint claims that the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin had …
Original post:
DOTmed.com – Insurance Company Accused of Revealing Medical …
‘Mayhem’ from Anthem data breach under investigation in Connecticut · Court Ruling Jeopardizes Credit Card Privacy Law · The Lo-Tech Reality of Identity Theft · Vague Regulations Increase Medical Identity Theft Risks …
See more here:
Boxes of medical files found abandoned in South Bend – South Bend …
A Des Moines man was convicted today in U.S. District Court in Seattle of 19 felony counts over threats he made against Boeing, Shell Oil and Chevron Oil, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. A jury deliberated about five hours following a four-day trial before reaching the verdict.
Read more from the original source:
Des Moines man convicted of threatening Boeing, oil companies (Seattle Times)
In the latest in the never-to-be ended series of data breach cases, a Connecticut District Court held that a plaintiff may not maintain a claim for damages after a data breach merely based on a fear of future identity theft losses. …
Read the original:
McLoughlin v. People's United Bank: No Claim for Future Identity …
Vandalism: A victim’s vehicle was vandalized in the middle of the night in the 10600 block of 176th Court Northeast. Lock it or lose it: Unknown suspect(s) stole a company laptop from an unlocked car in the 5600 block of 159th Place Northeast.
Excerpt from:
Police blotter (Redmond Reporter)
A chef was jailed for 12 months and the Court of First Instance ordered his deportation as he was found guilty of robbery, forgery and imperso- nation charges.
Original post:
Chef Jailed for Theft (Khaleej Times)
Defending the Digital Workplace focuses on employment and technology law challenges faced by business professionals. Jason Shinn is the author of this Blog. If you have a comment, tip, suggestion, or want to discuss a post, …. In this regard, the Court pointed to New Jersey’s Identity Theft Protection Act, (N.J.S.A. 56:11-44), which is a legislative recognition that it is necessary to restrict access to citizens’ social security numbers “in order to detect and prevent …
See original here:
Employers find they are walking a tightrope when it comes to …